It's going on now!
Check out the tweets at
https://twitter.com/zeiss_micro
This is the new incarnation of the MicroCT Methods Forum, with tips, tricks, information, and discussion about x-ray microtomographic imaging and applications. Anyone may join and post to the forum, and it is open to public reading.
Wednesday, 22 November 2017
Friday, 8 September 2017
My ToScA talk
Here is a pdf of the slides from my ToScA presentation.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/nxql9qu5tvcky9c/Metscher_ToScA-2017c.pdf?dl=0
and the video collage is now on YouTube at
https://youtu.be/85wocaNifP4
https://www.dropbox.com/s/nxql9qu5tvcky9c/Metscher_ToScA-2017c.pdf?dl=0
and the video collage is now on YouTube at
https://youtu.be/85wocaNifP4
Wednesday, 6 September 2017
Plant CT
Several people asked about published work on contrast-enhanced microCT for plant specimens. Here is an article from a group in Vienna, and a couple of more recent ones, as well as a couple of pictures I made using vascular contrast agents on wild and domestic cereal plants (details on request).
Staedler YM, Masson D, Schonenberger J. (2013).
Plant Tissues in 3D via X-Ray Tomography: Simple Contrasting Methods Allow High Resolution Imaging. PLoS ONE 8(9): e75295.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24086499
Saoirse R. Tracy, José Fernández Gómez, Craig J. Sturrock, Zoe A. Wilson and Alison C. Ferguson. 2017. Non-destructive determination of floral staging in cereals using X-ray micro computed tomography (µCT). Plant Methods 13:9
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0162-x
David Rousseau†, Thomas Widiez†, Sylvaine Di Tommaso, Hugo Rositi, Jerome Adrien, Eric Maire, Max Langer, Cécile Olivier, Françoise Peyrin and Peter Rogowsky. 2015.
Fast virtual histology using X-ray in-line phase tomography: application to the 3D anatomy of maize developing seeds. Plant Methods 11:55
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-015-0098-y
Staedler YM, Masson D, Schonenberger J. (2013).
Plant Tissues in 3D via X-Ray Tomography: Simple Contrasting Methods Allow High Resolution Imaging. PLoS ONE 8(9): e75295.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24086499
Saoirse R. Tracy, José Fernández Gómez, Craig J. Sturrock, Zoe A. Wilson and Alison C. Ferguson. 2017. Non-destructive determination of floral staging in cereals using X-ray micro computed tomography (µCT). Plant Methods 13:9
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0162-x
David Rousseau†, Thomas Widiez†, Sylvaine Di Tommaso, Hugo Rositi, Jerome Adrien, Eric Maire, Max Langer, Cécile Olivier, Françoise Peyrin and Peter Rogowsky. 2015.
Fast virtual histology using X-ray in-line phase tomography: application to the 3D anatomy of maize developing seeds. Plant Methods 11:55
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-015-0098-y
Monday, 21 August 2017
ToScA Workshop (Life Sciences): Microtomography for life sciences research
We will
begin with some principles of x-ray imaging, discuss various types of samples
and applications, and then work with your own interesting specimens.
You are
invited and encouraged to bring your own samples to the workshop! Fixation and
staining can take days, so you might want to prepare your samples ahead of
time.
Please also
bring pertinent questions, including issues concerning image analysis,
publishing, and archiving!
Details of
stains etc. are given in the accompanying blog entry. And you may of course
email me with questions: brian.metscher@unvie.ac.at
1) General advice about sample preparation for
microCT imaging
Fixation:
The best
fixation for microCT is the one that preserves the features you need to see. I
have had good results with most of the common fixation procedures, but the
properties and effects of the fixative must be taken into account for contrast
staining. Usually most relevant are shrinkage, decalcification, removal of
lipids or carbohydrates, and protein condensation or precipitation.
Preservation:
Samples can
usually be stained effectively after storage in 70% ethanol or in formalin. If
you want to use an aqueous stain, transfer the sample back to an aqueous
solution; likewise for alcoholic stains. Dry samples are easy (they're dry).
2) Some tips for preparing different sample
types
Insects & other arthropods:
I have had
good results from alcohol-fixed crawlies by re-fixing them in alcoholic Bouin's
(1:1 Bouin's:ethanol/IMS) for a few hours or longer and then dehydrating to
ethanol (absolute but not anhydrous, i.e. 96-100%), followed by staining in I2E
(below).
Others have
made excellent images of critical-point dried insects (better than HMDS; Sombke
et al. 2015).
Dry insects
can be scanned easily, but the internal anatomy is dodgy. Chitinous structures
usually come out beautiful. Pins can be a challenge, but scans can be done with
pinned insects.
Embryos and other squishy samples:
My
favourite fixative for soft stuff is 4F1G (4%
formaldehyde and 1% glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffer, or other appropriate
buffer, like PBS, or whatever your samples are happy in). The actual
concentrations of the two fixatives are not crucial; I usually just add
glutaraldehyde to 10% NBF and I'm done. The glut must be high-grade and fresh -
otherwise it polymerises and becomes less effective.
PTA and iodine both give good results. Shrinkage can
be a problem...
Little fish and anything that sort of resembles
a little fish:
Mostly the
same as embryos, but pay attention to whether you want to see e.g. brain,
visceral organs, muscles, bones, teeth, etc. Staining with PMA can allow nice
distinction of mineralised tissues and soft tissues; PTA in methanol has given
good images of hearing structures (Schulz-Mirbach et al. 2013a, b).
Samples in methanol:
Samples
preserved for nucleic acids work are often stored in methanol, typically after
aldehyde fixation. These can be stained easily and effectively with PTA in absolution methanol (van Soldt et al.
2015).
3) Mounting samples for microCT
The sample
must be immobilised and held on a vertical rotation axis for the duration of
the scan. I often use 0.5-1.0% agarose to embed (not infiltrate) samples in
narrow plastic tubes or micropipette tips. Other schemes can work also, and may
work better for some kinds of objects: bits of sponge and soda straws have
helped on occasion. Other friends of
sample mounting include Legos, Parafilm, UHU Patafix (Blu Tack), and a hot-glue
gun.
Contrast staining for soft tissues
Probably the most versatile microCT contrast stain for
soft tissue is diluted Lugol’s solution (aqueous iodine: Metscher 2009a,b;
Degenhardt et al. 2010; Gignac et al. 2016). There is more than one formulation
of "Lugol's;" the “IKI” solution I published in 2009 is actually 20%
Lugol’s, and my “10% IKI” is 2% Lugol’s. Always be clear about the actual
concentrations of iodine and iodide you are using (don't rely upon the term
"Lugol's" to specify the composition unambiguously).
IKI (Metscher 2009a, b)
|
2% (w/v) potassium iodide (KI) + 1% iodine (I2)
aqueous solution.
e.g. dissolve 2.0 g KI in 100ml distilled water, and
then add 1.0 g I2 (elemental iodine, "iodine metal").
The iodide dissolves easily, and elemental iodine
only dissolves in water along with iodide. Keeps indefinitely at room
temperature as far as I know.
|
Fix fish, embryos, or whatever in your favourite aqueous
fixative.
Rinse samples in water or buffer (they can go
directly to stain solution).
Stain overnight or longer. Change the solution when
it looks thinner.
Wash in water.
Some iodine will still leach out; this is usually not a problem.
Can be scanned in water or buffer, or mounted in
agarose.
|
Note that some plastics (notably pieces of sponge
used for bracing the specimen) will absorb some iodine, but not usually
enough to be a problem for scanning.
|
For specimens already stored or fixed in alcohol, an
alcoholic iodine solution works well. This stain is especially good for
arthropods.
I2E,
I2M (Metscher
2009a, b)
|
1% (w/v) iodine metal (I2) dissolved in
100% ethanol (I2E) or methanol (I2M)
I2 dissolves readily in alcohol.
|
Take samples to 100% alcohol.
Stain overnight or days or even weeks for larger
specimens.
Rinse in alcohol.
Scan in alcohol.
|
Iodine does not seem to work in 70% alcohol, only 0
or 100. Anyone know why?
In fact, storage in 70% ethanol usually removes most
of the iodine staining.
|
PTA is my other favourite stain. Used in some standard
histological staining methods, PTA is known to bind proteins and is commonly used
in electron microscopy. The chemistry of phosphomolybdic acid appears (to me
anyway) to be mostly similar, and PMA gives good staining also. And it's green.
I have had some preference for PMA as a counterstain in dual-energy imaging for
differentiating materials in a sample (see Handschuh et al. 2017).
PTA,
PMA (Metscher
2009a, b; Metscher 2011)
|
Works well on tissues fixed in formalin, 4F1G, glyoxal,
Bouin’s, or alcoholic Bouin’s.
|
Make a 1% (w/v) phosphotungstic acid solution in distilled
water.
Mix 30 ml 1% PTA solution + 70 ml absolute ethanol
to make
0.3% PTA in 70% ethanol. Keeps indefinitely.
The pH must be on the acidic side: the above solution
comes out around 2.9. The affinity of PTA for different proteins is
pH-dependent (Nemetschek 1979, Scott 1971, Silverman 1969), but I have not tested this systematically for use in microCT
imaging.
|
Take samples to 70% ethanol.
Stain overnight or longer. Change periodically for
larger samples.
Change to 70% ethanol.
Scan samples in 70% - 100% ethanol.
Store in 70-100% ethanol.
|
Gives high general radiopacity and excellent
contrast among tissues and structures in vertebrate embryos and soft-bodied invertebrates.
Penetration is vaguely 1-2 mm per day, so overnight
is usually sufficient for samples no thicker than about 3-4mm.
Staining is stable for months if not years.
Samples can
be embedded and sectioned for histology afterward.
|
Osmium
tetroxide (Johnson et al. 2006; Metscher 2009a, b)
|
Standard EM post-fixation, binds abundantly to
lipids.
|
Same as routine EM processing.
Osmium-stained samples can be scanned in resin
blocks, with some loss of contrast.
|
Gives very high radiopacity and no better tissue
contrast than PTA.
Osmium tetroxide is volatile and toxic, but your
local EM lab is probably already set up to work with it.
|
References for ToScA workshop notes
Handschuh
S, Beisser CJ, Ruthensteiner B, Metscher BD. (2017).
Microscopic
dual energy CT (microDECT): a flexible tool for multi-channel ex vivo 3D
imaging of biological specimens
Journal
of Microscopy (Oxford) 267(1): 3-26.
Johnson
JT, Hansen MS, Wu I, Healy LJ, Johnson CR, Jones GM, Capecchi MR, Keller C.
(2006).
Virtual
histology of transgenic mouse embryos for high-throughput phenotyping.
PLoS
Genetics 2(4): e61.
Metscher
BD. (2009).
MicroCT
for developmental biology: A versatile tool for high-contrast 3D imaging at
histological resolutions.
Dev Dyn
238(3): 632-640.
Metscher
BD. (2009).
MicroCT
for comparative morphology: simple staining methods allow high-contrast 3D
imaging of diverse non-mineralized tissues.
BMC
Physiology 9: 11.
Metscher
BD. (2011).
X-ray
microtomographic imaging of intact vertebrate embryos.
Cold
Spring Harbor protocols 2011(12): 1462-1471.
Schulz-Mirbach
T, Hess M, Metscher BD. (2013).
Sensory
epithelia of the fish inner ear in 3D: studied with high-resolution contrast
enhanced microCT.
Frontiers
in Zoology 10: 63.
Schulz-Mirbach
T, Hess M, Metscher BD, Ladich F. (2013).
A
unique swim bladder-inner ear connection in a teleost fish revealed by a
combined high-resolution microtomographic and three-dimensional histological
study.
BMC Biology
11: 75.
Sombke
A, Lipke E, Michalik P, Uhl G, Harzsch S. (2015).
Potential
and limitations of X-Ray micro-computed tomography in arthropod neuroanatomy: A
methodological and comparative survey.
The
Journal of comparative neurology 523(8): 1281-1295.
van
Soldt BJ, Metscher BD, Poelmann RE, Vervust B, Vonk FJ, Muller GB, Richardson
MK. (2015).
Heterochrony
and Early Left-Right Asymmetry in the Development of the Cardiorespiratory
System of Snakes.
PLoS
ONE 10(1): e116416.
Thursday, 13 July 2017
The microCT methods exchange
Welcome to the next-generation MicroCT Methods Forum! Soon I will post some protocols and references here, and I invite you to do the same.
Anyone can join and post (moderated by me, to prevent spam-based destruction of the blog). All comments are moderated also, but anyone (member or not) can comment on posts.
Appropriate material includes methods, protocols, helpful tricks and advice, job announcements, references to new publications, and links to great pictures and movies (or scientific image data sets).
Anyone can join and post (moderated by me, to prevent spam-based destruction of the blog). All comments are moderated also, but anyone (member or not) can comment on posts.
Appropriate material includes methods, protocols, helpful tricks and advice, job announcements, references to new publications, and links to great pictures and movies (or scientific image data sets).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)